صحافة بلادي صحيفة إلكترونية مغاربية متجددة على مدار الساعة تعنى بشؤون المغرب الجزائر ليبيا موريتانيا تونس
Against the backdrop of recent events related to the “Generation Z 212” gatherings, legal and media experts have warned of a widespread wave of digital misinformation and incitement, aimed at falsifying facts and inciting public opinion through the deliberate use of misplaced legal terminology. Experts emphasized that this method not only misleads followers, but may expose the publishers of this information to legal prosecution.
“Protest” versus “illegal gathering”
Experts explained that describing some gatherings with“Protest”Without mentioning that it is not licensed is intentionally misleading. Protest is a right regulated by law and requires prior permission from the authorities. In the absence of this procedure, the gathering is legally classified as an “unauthorized public gathering,” and the security response to it differs radically. Ignoring this legal characteristic aims to give false legitimacy to actions that may disrupt public order.
“Arrests” versus “arrests”
One of the most prominent fallacies that has been circulated is the use of the word “arrests” to describe police interventions. What is legally correct is “arrests.” Arrest is an initial measure carried out by the police on the spot to control order and determine the identities of people, while arrest (especially precautionary measure) is a judicial order issued later by the Public Prosecution or the investigating judge. The confusion between the two terms aims to exaggerate the event and portray a necessary security intervention as a crackdown.
“Police assault” versus “professional intervention”
Experts also monitored the spread of blog posts talking about “police attacks” on participants. They stress that security interventions to disperse illegal gatherings are carried out in accordance with strict professional and legal controls, aiming to impose public order with the least amount of force and in line with respect for human rights. Describing this professional intervention as an “assault” is clear incitement against public forces aimed at stripping them of confidence and inciting feelings of hostility against state institutions, which constitutes a crime punishable by law.
Source:My press
